Additional Representation to IWAI regarding NW-1

29.10.2014 | Bharat Jhunjhunwala

This representation is in continuation of earlier representation submitted to the Ministry of Shipping and the World Bank which we understand has been forwarded to IWAI.

1 Longitudinal Connectivity

ThThe Government of India has asked IIT Consortium (IITC) to make a Ganga River Basin Management Plan. One central recommendation of IITC is to maintain longitudinal connectivity:

Mission Aviral Dhara: For a given geological-climatic setting, alluvial rivers achieve stability through long-term balance between various parameters such as water and sediment flow rates, temporal variations of flow, terrain gradient, and seepage flow rates. “Aviral Dhara” emanates from this long-term balance of rivers. A direct violation of Aviral Dhara is due to dams and barrages, which snap the longitudinal connectivity in rivers and alter river water and sediment flows (Page iv, IITC Interim Report, attached).

Further IITC has stated that activities that break the longitudinal connectivity must not be implemented (Page 23, IITC Interim Report, attached). Therefore making of barrages should not even be considered.

2 Cost-Benefit Analysis

In compliance of an order of NGT, the Ministry of Environment had asked Indian Institute of Forest Management (IIFM) to frame guidelines for undertaking cost-benefit analysis. IIFM has given sector-specific guidelines. To the best of our knowledge, these guidelines have not been “accepted” or “rejected” by MOEF yet. Nevertheless, they indicate the range of costs that must be taken into account. The guidelines for irrigation and hydropower projects are relevant for the Waterway. The guidelines require the following costs to be monetized and taken into consideration.

  1. Human resettlement costs
  2. Environmental losses (ecosystem services of forests).
  3. Loss of potential value of land.
  4. Habitat fragmentation costs.
  5. Suffering to oustees.
  6. Loss of public infrastructure
  7. Economic costs of water borne diseases.
  8. Downstream costs (riverbank erosion, coastal erosion, groundwater, etc.). 
  9. Loss of aesthetic value of the river.
  10. Other activities required as a result of project activity (Such as terminals, jetties, etc,).
  11. Dam Removal costs. Impacts on terrestrial, aquatic and floral biodiversity.

It is submitted that these costs of the waterway project may be taken into account. Relevant extracts from IIFM Study are attached.

Impacts of upstream activities

The Government is committed to Ganga rejuvenation. At present nearly 100 percent water from the Ganga and Yamuna is abstracted at Narora and Hathnikund respectively. IITC has recommended E-flows of about 30-35% for the Ganga. Acceptance of this recommendation would lead to an increase in flow at Allahabad. In consequence the hydrological studies of depth available at present downstream of Allahabad will no longer be tenable.

It is necessary for IWAI to develop a scenario where such e-flows are released from the upstream and work out the DPR accordingly.

EIA before DPR

IWAI has already advertised seeking consultants for making EIA and EMP of NW-1. At the same time I was informed by the Project Director, NW-1, Shri Pravir Pandey that IWAI has rejected the DHI study suggesting making of 3 barrages between Allahabad and Ghazipur and IWAI is commissioned a fresh study de novo.

It is submitted that EIA is done for a project as specified in a DPR. EIA cannot be done if the project parameters are themselves uncertain. Therefore, the EIA study must be postponed until DPR is made and placed in public domain.


Minutes of Meeting with World Bank-2nd September, 2015
Saturday, 12 September 2015
A meeting was held with World Bank officials on 2 September, 2015. Representations: Jayanto Bandopadhyaya, Vimal Bhai, Prahlad Goenka, Bharat... Read More...
Representation to World Bank on TORs for NW-1 Studies
Tuesday, 25 August 2015
August 13, 2015 Shri Arnab Bandopadhyay The World Bank New Delhi My Dear Arnab: We write in continuation of our earlier interactions regarding NW-1.... Read More...
Comments on TOR for NW-1 Studies Submitted to Inland Waterways Authority of India
Tuesday, 25 August 2015
DR BHARAT JHUNJHUNWALA Lakshmoli, PO Maletha, Via Kirti Nagar, Dt Tehri UK 249 161 Phone: 99171-44777; Email: [email protected] August 13, 2015 Shri... Read More...
IMAGE Ganga Rejuvenation Must Go Beyond Lip Service
Saturday, 18 October 2014
Bharat Lal Seth | Fri, 10/17/2014 - 3:35pm | International Rivers   The rejuvenation of the Ganga figured prominently in the manifesto of the... Read More...
IMAGE Let the River Take its Course
Tuesday, 30 September 2014
Written by Ramaswamy R Iyer | Posted: September 30, 2014 2:10 am | The Indian Express Soon after the prime minister assumed... Read More...
IMAGE World Rivers Day and Ganga: A look at Farakka Barrage and other such calamities
Tuesday, 30 September 2014
Parineeta Dandekar | 29th September, 2014 | SANDRP   Last Sunday of every September is celebrated as ‘World Rivers Day’. It is a recent... Read More...
Water resources depleting in Ganga catchment area: Study
Wednesday, 12 August 2015
B.D. Kasniyal | The Tribune | Aug 11, 2015 Urbanisation, rampant felling of trees to blame for the depletion  Over 1,500 billion cusecs of... Read More...
Boatmen demand to lift ban on boating in Ganga
Monday, 10 August 2015
TNN | Aug 9, 2015 VARANASI: After 11 days of imposing of ban on boat operations in Ganga by the district administration due to rise in water level,... Read More...
IMAGE Farakka under fire in India
Monday, 04 May 2015
Abu Bakar Siddique | Dhaka Tribune | May 3, 2015 Nine Indian citizens move an environment court, seeking over Rs3,000 crore in annual compensation... Read More...


We have 20 guests and no members online

This week310
This month1649

Wednesday, 13 December 2017 16:20

Follows us on FB

Go to top